Login Register WSPC 2017 • Schedule • Participation • Location • WSC • WPC • Contact •Search •Recent





Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January
   LMI Tests -> Monthly Sudoku and Puzzle Tests168 posts • Page 5 of 7 • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
anurag
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-26 11:29 PM (#6513 - in reply to #6396) (#6513) Top




Posts: 136
10020
Location: India
As i see, the objective of this format is see if the solver can do the large puzzles in the first place.The difficulty indicators are certainly misleading for some of these.I really like the idea of using solving time as a primary indicator,as the difficulty only really points at the pleasure aspect.One can construct a very easy huge puzzle.On a negative note,the scoring system cannot be played much with unless
you are willing to make it a lot more informed.
thesubro
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-27 2:00 AM (#6514 - in reply to #6396) (#6514) Top




Posts: 23
20
Location: United States
I did all 10 puzzles, and eked out 57 bonus points, but my total score only shows as 957, and not 1057. Am I missing some element? Thanks. as always for being there in so many ways.

TheSubro
prasanna16391
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-27 2:04 AM (#6515 - in reply to #6514) (#6515) Top


2021 World Sudoku+Puzzle Convention Organizer

Posts: 1763
1000500100100202020
Location: India
thesubro - 2012-01-27 2:00 AM

I did all 10 puzzles, and eked out 57 bonus points, but my total score only shows as 957, and not 1057. Am I missing some element? Thanks. as always for being there in so many ways.

TheSubro


I suppose your worst puzzle has been discarded? Its best 9 out of 10.
Administrator
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-27 9:42 AM (#6516 - in reply to #6466) (#6516) Top


2000100050020
Location: India
Para - 2012-01-21 10:58 PM

anurag - 2012-01-21 9:08 PM

I tried hard to understand what the puzzles column (with such values as "1/1/1") means? I know it could be listing all the submission attempts ,but i am not sure as that is still a conflict in my case. I submitted only one puzzle and it shows three values! Damn i wasted lot of time on the pentomino grid.


I think it is: BONUS/CORRECT/SUBMITTED

Missed this post earlier.

It is BONUS/CORRECT/STARTED
kiwijam
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-28 4:16 PM (#6518 - in reply to #6396) (#6518) Top




Posts: 181
10020202020
Location: New Zealand
Well done Deb, a great concept and I hope we see something like this again.
Many thanks to the authors for 10 quality puzzles!
Nilz
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-28 7:35 PM (#6519 - in reply to #6396) (#6519) Top




Posts: 29
20
Location: United Kingdom
Really good format- it was nice to be able to spend as long or as little time in a row solving as you wanted, instead of having to find a 3 hour block of free time.
I would say that in my view, it makes sense to try to get the puzzles all at similar difficulty levels- here, someone who messed up the easiest puzzle was penalised a lot more (relative to other solvers) than someone who messed up the hardest puzzle. But I acknowledge that that may not be feasible.
One possible amendment to the scoring, to avoid that issue, could be: fastest solver gets 0 points. Everyone else scores a point for every second longer that they take, up to a max of 3600. Obviously lowest total score wins, so there must be a penalty for not solving a puzzle at all (perhaps 4000). The only problem would be knowing when there is no chance of getting any extra points, and hence being able to take a break (though I think you could assume that Mr. Snyder will finish everything within 30 mins, so you'd never need to continue on for longer than 90 mins).
Cyclone
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-28 10:06 PM (#6520 - in reply to #6396) (#6520) Top




Posts: 8

Location: Canada
Finally got back around to trying that Braille Word Search...managed to nail it, would have been quicker had I only noticed one word sooner (and if not for a five-minute interruption phone call).

I started thinking about converting Pennypress puzzles (American publisher) to Braille for fun. Realized it doesn't work exactly that way; in effect, it's almost like three separate small puzzles merging to become a single puzzle, with each horizontal row taking every third line in order.

Cyclone

Edited by Deb to remove the exact word. The test is still running :-)
Further edited by CycloneGU to replace what looks like bad language. Seriously, though, does noting the word here make a difference other than indicating that one word is in there? =)

Edited by Cyclone 2012-01-28 10:33 PM
debmohanty
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-28 10:42 PM (#6521 - in reply to #6520) (#6521) Top



1000500100100100202020
Location: India
Cyclone - 2012-01-28 10:06 PM

Further edited by CycloneGU to replace what looks like bad language. Seriously, though, does noting the word here make a difference other than indicating that one word is in there? =)

It probably doesn't.
Since the test is still running, I thought it is best that we don't reveal "a part of the puzzle". After the test is over, I would have un-edited the post, like I've done to several posts in past tests.
debmohanty
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-28 10:56 PM (#6522 - in reply to #6519) (#6522) Top



1000500100100100202020
Location: India
Thanks James and Nil for your feedback, and congrats for good scores.
We are certainly going to repeat the format, so we'll discuss about potential changes in the scoring system in the end.


Message to all players who have stopped solving at 7 or 8 puzzles. Please note that the rank that you see now in the partial score page will take a huge dip, you don't get to at least 9 puzzles. You still have 30 hours to participate further.
greenhorn
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-29 12:13 AM (#6523 - in reply to #6515) (#6523) Top


2021 World Sudoku+Puzzle Convention Organizer

Posts: 164
100202020
Location: Slovakia
prasanna16391 - 2012-01-27 2:04 AM

thesubro - 2012-01-27 2:00 AM

I did all 10 puzzles, and eked out 57 bonus points, but my total score only shows as 957, and not 1057. Am I missing some element? Thanks. as always for being there in so many ways.

TheSubro


I suppose your worst puzzle has been discarded? Its best 9 out of 10.



Was it really mentioned somewhere before the contest? I haven´t seen it until now. I stopped solving seriously after spoiling first puzzle.
Cyclone
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-29 12:45 AM (#6524 - in reply to #6521) (#6524) Top




Posts: 8

Location: Canada
debmohanty - 2012-01-28 12:42 PM

Cyclone - 2012-01-28 10:06 PM

Further edited by CycloneGU to replace what looks like bad language. Seriously, though, does noting the word here make a difference other than indicating that one word is in there? =)

It probably doesn't.
Since the test is still running, I thought it is best that we don't reveal "a part of the puzzle". After the test is over, I would have un-edited the post, like I've done to several posts in past tests.

Meh, I'll edit it back in myself later.

Or you can.

I suppose it would be wrong to mention that the Samurai Sudoku uses the digits 1 through 9? (Note I haven't solved it yet, or tried...will this evening perhaps.)

Random question. Why are typical smiley codes not used here?

Cyclone


Edited by Cyclone 2012-01-29 12:47 AM
prasanna16391
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-29 12:59 AM (#6525 - in reply to #6523) (#6525) Top


2021 World Sudoku+Puzzle Convention Organizer

Posts: 1763
1000500100100202020
Location: India
greenhorn - 2012-01-29 12:13 AM

Was it really mentioned somewhere before the contest? I haven´t seen it until now. I stopped solving seriously after spoiling first puzzle.


See the Instruction Booklet "Scoring" paragraph, at the end, "Players who solve all 10 will have their worst puzzle discarded" or something like that.

Edited by prasanna16391 2012-01-29 12:59 AM
debmohanty
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-29 1:01 AM (#6526 - in reply to #6524) (#6526) Top



1000500100100100202020
Location: India
greenhorn - 2012-01-29 12:13 AM
Was it really mentioned somewhere before the contest? I haven´t seen it until now. I stopped solving seriously after spoiling first puzzle.

It is mentioned in "Scoring" section in the IB. See last line. And it was also mentioned in forum, while answering to kiwijam's questions.

Cyclone - 2012-01-29 12:45 AM
Random question. Why are typical smiley codes not used here?
The forum didn't have all smileys inbuilt. We added some smileys, but yes, it is not complete. Some other forums (e.g. phpBB) have a more exhaustive list of smileys.
greenhorn
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-29 1:02 AM (#6527 - in reply to #6525) (#6527) Top


2021 World Sudoku+Puzzle Convention Organizer

Posts: 164
100202020
Location: Slovakia
prasanna16391 - 2012-01-29 12:59 AM

greenhorn - 2012-01-29 12:13 AM

Was it really mentioned somewhere before the contest? I haven´t seen it until now. I stopped solving seriously after spoiling first puzzle.


See the Instruction Booklet "Scoring" paragraph, at the end, "Players who solve all 10 will have their worst puzzle discarded" or something like that.



To "solve" the instructions is always the hardes puzzle for me
debmohanty
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-29 1:11 AM (#6528 - in reply to #6527) (#6528) Top



1000500100100100202020
Location: India
greenhorn - 2012-01-29 1:02 AM
To "solve" the instructions is always the hardes puzzle for me
Just like you should always solve the example of a new puzzle type, you should also "solve the instructions" of a new type test
forcolin
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-29 5:09 AM (#6529 - in reply to #6528) (#6529) Top





Posts: 171
100202020
Location: ITALY
Phew! Just finished! It was tough but enjoyable. Thanks to Deb and the team for the huge amount of work done and for a very attractive formula. I notice that in spite of the length of the contest the distances between players are minimal (which means that the 10 minutes I trew away stupidly on one puzzle for not reading the instructions costed me several positions....). Also glad I could end in bonus position on 9 puzzle out of 10 (well, I like to leave space for further improvement for next time....). Congratulations to all those which finished at the top, and relized times which are a bit embarrassing for the average player....

The formula is almost perfect. I feel I can support an improvement among those proposed. I do agree with detuned, when I says

detuned - 2012-01-26 8:44 PM
Perhaps one solution for next time is to have different bonus windows for puzzles of objectively differing difficulties - for example 45/60/75 for easy/medium/hard? Even then, this seems problematic because you don't want one or two puzzles deciding the whole contest because there happen to be only a handful of solvers who are way ahead of everyone else - in this case you would be handing a free 30 points to people who are especially good at sudoku and kakuro (which is clearly a non-trivial overlap!).


perhaps next time the most difficult puzzles will not be of the same type of this time.... however I feel that life has been particularly cruel for a player which solved one of the difficult puzzles in, say, 59'55" and got 0.1 bonus points, i.e. only .1 point more of a player who solved it in 2 hours, particularly if only a handful of solvers could finish that puzzle with the bonus. so the formula 45/60/75 (and perhaps 90), although arbitary, is a good idea and I support it.

while I do not agree with Motris
motris - 2012-01-26 9:13 PM

I think the best change is to use either rank on a puzzle for bonus scoring purposes or normalized time (like croco-puzzle).


The formula relies on the possibility, which many players have used, to stop solving a puzzle, putting it in a corner and solve it the next day or later once the possibility for the bonus has been lost. In this case the concept of normalized time is heavily affected and meaningless because the number of player doing this will vary from puzzle to puzzle, depending on the difficulty. Also, a player needs to know in advance the criteria of awarding the bonus.

I renew my thanks to the organizers and authors and look forward for the next one of these.
Stefano
motris
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-29 11:04 AM (#6530 - in reply to #6529) (#6530) Top




Posts: 199
10020202020
Location: United States
Stefano, I was trying very hard to not give a specific formula, because I think it is more important to speak to the goals of a scoring formula and match them to the test. As a contest constructor I will say that it is very hard before the test, when you've seen just 2 or 3 solvers, to put a fair value on all of the puzzles, particularly with complicated bonus. Also, when having so many constructors (7), it will be very hard to have consistency of difficulty. To say puzzle X should be 75 or 45 might be better, but it might not be correct. And if the puzzle you made into a 75 turned out much easier than a 60 then you are really screwing up the test results by using a guess, and not a more robust formula.

A simple formula might be "top time + 30 minute window" gets some bonus, like what Nilz mentions, which would still have an effective one hour cut-off. I personally prefer something like this:

Solvers in the top 10th percentile earn bonus. Specifically, the top solver earns 100 + X points, solvers in top 10th percentile earn bonus proportion to time gap from 100th to 90th percentile. Solvers at 90th and below get 100 points. With the results I'm seeing on this test, there still is a stable "one hour is too long, so you can start over whenever" effect, and actually for many puzzles the time is now more like 40 minutes. But now you let the competitors scale the times, not 2 or 3 test-solvers.

I'm a bit frustrated that my best relative puzzle performance on this test is the puzzle I have to drop. I'm not frustrated enough because of how I did on other puzzles, but I want a good system that works in general for this kind of test but maintains the goal of removing pressure after one hour. I probably should not have mentioned croco-puzzle specifically, because I did not mean a 3000 to 0 scale. I meant something more like a 3000 to 2700 scale where every solver below 2700 goes up to 2700 whenever they finish. I hope something like this would meet your approval, because my goal is not to ruin the benefit of having comfort to sleep on a mistake and start again the next day.

Edited by motris 2012-01-29 11:49 AM
macherlakumar
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-29 6:48 PM (#6532 - in reply to #6396) (#6532) Top





Posts: 123
10020
Location: India
Feeling very happy after solving all the puzzles :)
Honestly I did not think I could make this far.
I should have been aggressive and solved few of them on paper (actually solved all of them using MS Paint) at least that would have fetched some bonus.

Thanks to Deb, LMI team and the authors for a wonderful contest.
I hope everyone will complete all the puzzles.

Regards,
Ravi
flk
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-29 9:18 PM (#6534 - in reply to #6396) (#6534) Top




Posts: 23
20
Location: Australia
I really enjoyed the puzzles, thanks to all the authors for the fun! Given the differences in difficulties, I also think it would make sense to normalise the puzzles based on observed performance.

Also congrats Macher, I also used mspaint for everything and it can be annoying at times. I am now trying Paint.NET which is similar but has layers and unlimited undos - useful for when you want to *cheat*!
prasanna16391
Subject: RE: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-29 11:50 PM (#6535 - in reply to #6396) (#6535) Top


2021 World Sudoku+Puzzle Convention Organizer

Posts: 1763
1000500100100202020
Location: India
Good to know there are other people who have to struggle with paint during these tests too
Administrator
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-30 5:06 AM (#6536 - in reply to #6396) (#6536) Top


2000100050020
Location: India
Score page is under maintenance, and will be back online soon.
Administrator
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-30 5:33 AM (#6537 - in reply to #6396) (#6537) Top


2000100050020
Location: India
Submission is now disabled for Puzzle Marathon.
debmohanty
Subject: RE: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-30 6:30 AM (#6538 - in reply to #6396) (#6538) Top



1000500100100100202020
Location: India
Puzzle Marathon is now over. Congratulations to motris, MellowMelon and Kota for winning.

Individual puzzle wise, there were 6 winners. Volxa (Kakuro), motris (Loop The Loops, Samurai Sudoku, Braille Word Search, Pentomino Areas), xevs (Graffiti Snake), Para (Black And White Loop, Small Regions), ACM (Tapa)

In a turn of events, I have many individuals to thank to for this event.
Thanks to Rohan, Serkan and Zoltan to first listening to the idea and believing in it, and then adding all the required inputs. The scoring system, the puzzles types could have been very different without their suggestions.
Thanks to all puzzle authors : Tom (Kakuro), Prasanna (Loop The Loops), Serkan (Graffiti Snake), David Millar (Braille Word Search and for the logo), Zoltan (Black And White Loop, Small Regions), Vladimir (Pentomino Areas and Tapa). I wrote Different Neighbours and Samurai Sudoku, and unfortunately the difficulty of Samurai was not appropriate.

I hope everyone enjoyed the test.

Link to score page : http://logicmastersindia.com/M201201P/score.asp
If your name is missing in the score page, it is intentional. Please PM me for clarification.
MellowMelon
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-30 7:47 AM (#6539 - in reply to #6538) (#6539) Top


Fillomino-Fillia 2 Author

100
Location: United States
Thanks for some great puzzles. Regarding Samurai: I had figured the IB version was just going to be much harder than the actual one. If it had been mentioned that the two would be similarly hard, I could have pointed out there would be a problem. I'm sure many others could have too.

I find it funny how my individual puzzle rankings resemble my WPC playoff ones. Here I didn't win any of the puzzles but my time was in the top 5 for all of the types I care about (sudoku and word searches are bleh). Similarly in the WPC playoff: on every puzzle I had the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th fastest time of the competitors that finished, but never the fastest. (which reminds me that I got sent the time breakdowns in an email with a promise that it would be posted publically soon after, but I guess that slipped someone's mind)
Apparently I'm better at being consistent than having incredible times on individual puzzles.

One thing I would like to discuss that wasn't in the feedback is answer extraction. Obviously some of these methods are tried and true (Sudoku, Star Battle), and I continue to find the "longest group" method very nice as well (Tapa, Snake, Loops) especially given its advantages in an instant grading system.

I haven't seen the Kakuro and Different Neighbors style before, but that might be one of the cleanest of any mechanisms I've seen. Finding marked squares is often a pain, and in November's test it was even common to miss some I's/J's. This one-per-column system with all of those columns marked solves that issue in an extremely nice way. I hope this one is adopted by all future tests where appropriate.

The Word Search and Pentomino Areas extractions were fine - not amazing but not at all bad. Black and White Loop was the only mechanism that really bothered me. It's a good method for smaller grids, but keeping track of things on the large grid was tricky. I was half expecting to get the red X on my first submission for that one (the time penalty wasn't enough to justify further checking).
figonometry
Subject: Re: Puzzle Marathon — 21st-29th January @ 2012-01-30 8:30 AM (#6540 - in reply to #6396) (#6540) Top




Posts: 30
20
Location: Canada
Thanks for the test. Awesome, as always.

Funny story: Even though Graffiti Snake was one of my best puzzles, relatively speaking, one piece of logic I'd been using was completely bogus: Since the head and tail were in opposite corners, the snake has to cross each line an odd number of times. So, for example, if there are an odd number of clues in a column, exactly one of the black bars has to touch the edge of the grid, so that there aren't an even number of gates. However! Since a snake could enter the gate and leave on the same side it entered, that wouldn't count as a crossing. Therefore, bogus logic. (An example of a column that fails my test would be the one with 5-3-3.)

I hope I explained that well enough. It just means that I got really lucky.

Edited by figonometry 2012-01-30 8:31 AM
168 posts • Page 5 of 7 • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version