Login Register WSPC 2017 • Schedule • Participation • Location • WSC • WPC • Contact •Search •Recent





Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier
   LMI Tests -> Puzzle Ramayan62 posts • Page 1 of 3 • 1 2 3
drsteve
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 3:03 AM (#20743 - in reply to #20653) (#20743) Top




Posts: 12

Location: United Kingdom
 How well did the variants represent the theme of the test ? variations represented the theme well
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Too many medium difficult puzzles
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Windows
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


A fun test - on the one hand, I found it a bit easy, on the other, it was nice to finish one of these for once.
An LMI player
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 5:03 AM (#20745 - in reply to #20653) (#20745) Top


 How well did the variants represent the theme of the test ? variations represented the theme well
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Fairly Nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Heyawacky
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


Hotel
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 8:22 AM (#20746 - in reply to #20653) (#20746) Top




Posts: 11

Location: Japan
 How well did the variants represent the theme of the test ? variations represented the theme well
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Heyawacky
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


Nice puzzles. Especially I enjoyed Heyawacky 4.
rakesh_rai
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 11:25 AM (#20747 - in reply to #20653) (#20747) Top



Mean Minis (2020) Author

Posts: 774
500100100202020
Location: India
 How well did the variants represent the theme of the test ? variations represented the theme well
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Lakes
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


vopani
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 1:21 PM (#20748 - in reply to #20653) (#20748) Top


WSPC Organizer

Posts: 739
50010010020
Location: India
 How well did the variants represent the theme of the test ? variations represented the theme well
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Heyawacky
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


I felt this was the most balanced PR round so far.

Excellent puzzles and a good hour spent in solving them.
Thanks Swaroop!
chaotic_iak
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 2:49 PM (#20749 - in reply to #20653) (#20749) Top



Typed Logic Author

Posts: 241
1001002020
Location: Indonesia
 How well did the variants represent the theme of the test ? variations represented the theme well
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Lakes
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


A fun set overall, if more on the easier side. Apparently Windows is a type that can be broken by intuition; I did Windows 4 in 2m25, the largest point/time ratio for this test.

I'm not very certain why Paint by Numbers is chosen here, since it's not a very deep type on its own; I don't think there's too many variations of tricks that can be used there. On the other hand, it's perhaps the type that is most well-known to people not active in competitive puzzling, so perhaps that's a reason on its own. It's also interesting that there's a lack of "common" shading types such as Nurikabe, but since the basic things of shading puzzles are covered ("black cells cannot be adjacent" and "white cells form contiguous region" are by Heyawacky; "black cells are connected" and "no 2x2 black cells" are by Windows; even Nurikabe's own island rule exists as Lakes), I guess the variations do represent the theme well.
prasanna16391
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 2:58 PM (#20750 - in reply to #20653) (#20750) Top


2021 World Sudoku+Puzzle Convention Organizer

Posts: 1780
100050010010020202020
Location: India
The reason for including Paint By Numbers is exactly what you said, it is familiar and easy to understand.
Puzlifouk
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 4:29 PM (#20751 - in reply to #20653) (#20751) Top




Posts: 67
202020
Location: France
 How well did the variants represent the theme of the test ? variations represented the theme well
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Fairly Nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Crazy Pavement
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


AndreyBogdanov
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 5:08 PM (#20752 - in reply to #20653) (#20752) Top


Snowmen Author

Posts: 44
2020
Location: Russia
 How well did the variants represent the theme of the test ? variations represented the theme well
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Too many easy puzzles
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Fairly Nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Lakes
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Many puzzles were worth too much or too little
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


kishy72
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 9:36 PM (#20755 - in reply to #20653) (#20755) Top


SM 2020 (Math) Author

Posts: 417
100100100100
Location: India
 How well did the variants represent the theme of the test ? variations represented the theme well
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Heyawacky
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


Just one word to describe the set.

Splendid !!

This becomes my favourite PR round so far and I am confident that it will remain that way until the end.Everything was perfect about the test.Construction/Points distribution/Difficulty/Selection of puzzle genres etc.,.My favourites of the test were Heyawacky (10 Points)and Windows(11 points).

Tremendous job Swaroop.Just for designing this test,you deserve a place in the Puzzle Team this year :-p.Simply stunning work behind the scenes.I greatly enjoyed the set.Thanks a lot for the test.

You made me experience the concept of 'fun' in a puzzle test which occurs very rarely.So you made me give an all "green" feedback in a puzzle test :)which is another of those rare things that I thought will never happen .Perfect work!!Keep it up!
Helen
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 9:44 PM (#20756 - in reply to #20653) (#20756) Top




Posts: 4

Location: Australia
 How well did the variants represent the theme of the test ? variations represented the theme well
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Crazy Pavement
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


A very nice puzzle set and I thought the difficulty level was nicely targeted for beginners. Thanks to the creators :)

Edited by Helen 2016-01-23 9:46 PM
ghirsch
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 10:36 PM (#20759 - in reply to #20653) (#20759) Top




Posts: 102
100
Location: United States
 How well did the variants represent the theme of the test ? variations represented the theme well
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Crazy Pavement
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


Once again, this set was a lot of fun, though maybe a little too easy. There was a good amount of variety in the different puzzle types, and I liked seeing some unfamiliar types. Heyawacky 4 was very nice, and I also really liked both instructionless puzzles (though I made the stupid mistake of solving the instructionless Heyawacky example, thinking it was one of the puzzles for points).
swaroop2011
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 10:36 PM (#20760 - in reply to #20743) (#20760) Top



PR 2020 (Shading and Loops) Author

Posts: 668
500100202020
Location: India
drsteve - 2016-01-23 3:03 AM

A fun test - on the one hand, I found it a bit easy, on the other, it was nice to finish one of these for once.


I am glad you enjoyed. Thanks for the feedback. Yes indeed this test was targeted towards easy side.
swaroop2011
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 10:37 PM (#20761 - in reply to #20746) (#20761) Top



PR 2020 (Shading and Loops) Author

Posts: 668
500100202020
Location: India
Hotel - 2016-01-23 8:22 AM

Nice puzzles. Especially I enjoyed Heyawacky 4.


I am glad you enjoyed. Thanks for the feedback.
swaroop2011
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 10:38 PM (#20762 - in reply to #20748) (#20762) Top



PR 2020 (Shading and Loops) Author

Posts: 668
500100202020
Location: India
Rohan Rao - 2016-01-23 1:21 PM

I felt this was the most balanced PR round so far.

Excellent puzzles and a good hour spent in solving them.
Thanks Swaroop!


Thanks for your feedback. I am glad you enjoyed the test. You did well.
swaroop2011
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 10:41 PM (#20763 - in reply to #20749) (#20763) Top



PR 2020 (Shading and Loops) Author

Posts: 668
500100202020
Location: India
chaotic_iak - 2016-01-23 2:49 PM

A fun set overall, if more on the easier side. Apparently Windows is a type that can be broken by intuition; I did Windows 4 in 2m25, the largest point/time ratio for this test.

I'm not very certain why Paint by Numbers is chosen here, since it's not a very deep type on its own; I don't think there's too many variations of tricks that can be used there. On the other hand, it's perhaps the type that is most well-known to people not active in competitive puzzling, so perhaps that's a reason on its own. It's also interesting that there's a lack of "common" shading types such as Nurikabe, but since the basic things of shading puzzles are covered ("black cells cannot be adjacent" and "white cells form contiguous region" are by Heyawacky; "black cells are connected" and "no 2x2 black cells" are by Windows; even Nurikabe's own island rule exists as Lakes), I guess the variations do represent the theme well.


Thanks for your feedback. Yes this round was targeted towards easy side. Although the details regarding thinking behind selection of puzzles and difficulty will be posted once the test is over.
But just to complete the reasoning for Paint by Numbers, it's as what you said. It's easy to do, fun and suitable for beginners.
I am glad you enjoyed the test.
swaroop2011
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 10:46 PM (#20764 - in reply to #20755) (#20764) Top



PR 2020 (Shading and Loops) Author

Posts: 668
500100202020
Location: India
kishy72 - 2016-01-23 9:36 PM

Just one word to describe the set.

Splendid !!

This becomes my favourite PR round so far and I am confident that it will remain that way until the end.Everything was perfect about the test.Construction/Points distribution/Difficulty/Selection of puzzle genres etc.,.My favourites of the test were Heyawacky (10 Points)and Windows(11 points).

Tremendous job Swaroop.Just for designing this test,you deserve a place in the Puzzle Team this year :-p.Simply stunning work behind the scenes.I greatly enjoyed the set.Thanks a lot for the test.

You made me experience the concept of 'fun' in a puzzle test which occurs very rarely.So you made me give an all "green" feedback in a puzzle test :)which is another of those rare things that I thought will never happen .Perfect work!!Keep it up!


Thank you for your kind words. I am happy that you really enjoyed the test and had fun.
You did very well in the test. Although frankly, I expected you could have completed the test just within time. But nevertheless nice performance.
swaroop2011
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 11:14 PM (#20765 - in reply to #20756) (#20765) Top



PR 2020 (Shading and Loops) Author

Posts: 668
500100202020
Location: India
Helen - 2016-01-23 9:44 PM

A very nice puzzle set and I thought the difficulty level was nicely targeted for beginners. Thanks to the creators :)


Thank you for your feedback. Yes indeed it was targeted for beginners. I expect many of them to finish this test.
swaroop2011
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-23 11:16 PM (#20766 - in reply to #20759) (#20766) Top



PR 2020 (Shading and Loops) Author

Posts: 668
500100202020
Location: India
ghirsch - 2016-01-23 10:36 PM

Once again, this set was a lot of fun, though maybe a little too easy. There was a good amount of variety in the different puzzle types, and I liked seeing some unfamiliar types. Heyawacky 4 was very nice, and I also really liked both instructionless puzzles (though I made the stupid mistake of solving the instructionless Heyawacky example, thinking it was one of the puzzles for points).


Thank you for your feedback. I am happy you enjoyed the test.
Yes that happens sometimes, also the reason could be that you saw 2 examples for Heyawacky as against 1 example of Crazy pavement instruction less.
Eykir
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-24 12:17 AM (#20769 - in reply to #20653) (#20769) Top




Posts: 11

Location: United States
 How well did the variants represent the theme of the test ? variations represented the theme well
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Too many easy puzzles
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Windows
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


kousek-nebe
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-24 1:48 AM (#20770 - in reply to #20653) (#20770) Top




Posts: 20
20
Location: Czech Republic
 How well did the variants represent the theme of the test ? variations represented the theme well
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Crazy Pavement
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


Nola
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-24 3:47 AM (#20771 - in reply to #20653) (#20771) Top




Posts: 18

Location: Germany
 How well did the variants represent the theme of the test ? variations represented the theme well
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Crazy Pavement
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


puzzlemad
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-24 3:53 AM (#20772 - in reply to #20653) (#20772) Top




Posts: 28
20
Location: United Kingdom
Thank you very much. A few careless mistakes from myself wasted my time, so I didn't get chance to go back to the last Heyawacky to finish it (that is a type that I'm normally rubbish at). Thoroughly enjoyed the test.
TiiT
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-24 6:40 PM (#20775 - in reply to #20653) (#20775) Top




Posts: 139
10020
Location: Estonia
 How well did the variants represent the theme of the test ? variations represented the theme well
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Windows
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


MrLiang
Subject: Re: Shading - 23rd - 26th Jan 2016 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2016-01-24 9:48 PM (#20776 - in reply to #20653) (#20776) Top





Posts: 44
2020
Location: Thailand
 How well did the variants represent the theme of the test ? variations represented the theme well
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Crazy Pavement
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


62 posts • Page 1 of 3 • 1 2 3
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version