Login Register WSPC 2017 • Schedule • Participation • Location • WSC • WPC • Contact •Search •Recent





Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier
   LMI Tests -> Puzzle Ramayan42 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1 2
rob
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-18 2:54 AM (#22684 - in reply to #22657) (#22684) Top


Classics & Regions (PR 2016/17) Author

Posts: 170
100202020
Location: Germany
Wow, indeed, that was (too) hard. I had to resort to quite guessy solving for quite a few of these, certainly not the difficulty I'm used to for Ramayan. For me it was still a fun contest, just not what I expected.

I'm not that happy with the instructionless battleships puzzle, though: It's really not that apparent that the relations should apply to "half rows", while you'd usually expect them to apply to the two cells that are immediately adjacent.

Worse, the example is uniquely solvable with the given solution with the following rules: Normal battleships. Equals sign between cells means both cells are filled or both are empty. Less than sign between cells means that if the "smaller" cell is filled, then also the "greater" cell must be filled.

Admittedly this is not quite a satisfying rule set, but it's close enough that I think the type needs a better example.
Eykir
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-18 9:46 AM (#22685 - in reply to #22657) (#22685) Top




Posts: 11

Location: United States
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Hungarian Tetromino/Pentomino
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Mostly perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


Swagatam
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-18 1:13 PM (#22686 - in reply to #22657) (#22686) Top




Posts: 45
2020
Location: India
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Too many hard puzzles
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Fairly Nice
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth too much or too little


TheGreatEscaper
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-18 9:31 PM (#22687 - in reply to #22657) (#22687) Top




Posts: 1

Location: Australia
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Tetromino/Pentomino Instructionless
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Answer keys could have been better
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


This was really fun, this was the first test I've taken on this site. I think I managed to do fairly well, although obviously there were people doing miles better than I was! The puzzles were really fun, and had very nice solving paths. Super enjoyable, I'll be a regular from now on!
TiiT
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-18 11:52 PM (#22688 - in reply to #22657) (#22688) Top




Posts: 139
10020
Location: Estonia
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Tetromino/Pentomino Instructionless
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


tamz29
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-19 1:11 AM (#22689 - in reply to #22657) (#22689) Top




Posts: 225
10010020
Location: Thailand
Definitely harder than the previous two PR's.
I would recommend something else as answer keys for Minesweepers and Akari.
Counting mines each row in a big grid (which was worth like 2 points was quite irking).
Maybe, count 3-4 rows/columns instead?

I enjoyed the pentomino section a lot, the second instructionless was very beautiful - although I was 30 seconds too late to submit it :(
kiwijam
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-19 3:55 AM (#22690 - in reply to #22657) (#22690) Top




Posts: 187
10020202020
Location: New Zealand
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Tetromino/Pentomino Instructionless
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


An excellent set of puzzles. My thanks to Nikola Zivanovic and Cedomir Milanovic, you made me happy today. :)
bob
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-19 6:00 AM (#22691 - in reply to #22657) (#22691) Top




Posts: 59
2020
Location: United States
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Too many hard puzzles
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Average
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Tetromino/Pentomino Instructionless
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Answer keys could have been better
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth too much or too little
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


I found many of the puzzles extremely difficult/impossible and am quite discouraged. Battleships--lots of trial and error. Instructionless didn't understand. I get that a ship middle is greater than a ship end and that ship ends are greater than water. But some ship ends are greater than other ship ends?? Minesweeper 3 (worth 2 points) I checked SIX times and I still don't see where I went wrong, lots of time wasted. The first tetromino placement I fumbled around with for some time--these seem largely intuition based. Some solvers can "see" how the pieces fall into place, I guess. I certainly can't. No time for anything else. Maybe time to try a different hobby.
skywalker
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-19 5:49 PM (#22692 - in reply to #22657) (#22692) Top


Sudoku Grand Prix - Serbian Round Author

Posts: 42
2020
Location: Serbia
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Too many medium difficult puzzles
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Hungarian Tetromino/Pentomino
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Mostly perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


kishy72
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-19 8:16 PM (#22693 - in reply to #22657) (#22693) Top


SM 2020 (Math) Author

Posts: 417
100100100100
Location: India
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Too many hard puzzles
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Below Average
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Minesweeper
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Mostly perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth too much or too little
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


An LMI player
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-19 9:08 PM (#22694 - in reply to #22657) (#22694) Top


 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Fairly Nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Hungarian Tetromino/Pentomino
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Answer keys could have been better
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Many puzzles were worth too much or too little
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? I have a different complaint


Thanks for a nice test.

One complaint with the puzzle booklet:
I'm using Ubuntu and answer grids for Instructionless examples were not printed while visible at the screen. Other grids are printed normally. I don't think this affected my perfomance significantly, but was definitely annoying.
WA1729
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-19 10:37 PM (#22695 - in reply to #22657) (#22695) Top



Shading and Loops (PR 2016/17) Author

Posts: 62
202020
Location: United States
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Tetromino/Pentomino Observer
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


Very nice! I loved the variations in this one. My favorite sets were the Hungarian Polyomino and Polyomino Observer puzzles.

Favorite Puzzles:

Pentomino Observer 3
Classic Tetromino 1
Akari 2
Tetromino Observer 2
Hungarian Tetromino 1

Thank you!
mikeylyk
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-20 11:44 AM (#22696 - in reply to #22657) (#22696) Top




Posts: 16

Location: United States
im taking test now, there is no abc labels on tetromino observer, what order do letters go?
Administrator
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-20 11:54 AM (#22697 - in reply to #22657) (#22697) Top


2000100050020
Location: India
Enter the rows first, from top to bottom. Then columns from left to right.
swaroop2011
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-20 3:24 PM (#22698 - in reply to #22657) (#22698) Top



PR 2020 (Shading and Loops) Author

Posts: 668
500100202020
Location: India
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Too many hard puzzles
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Fairly Nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Battleships Instructionless
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


Very nice set of puzzles. But felt too many hard puzzles considering the spirit of PR.
Need to solve yet remaining ones. Mostly the high pointers left.
I liked the Instructionless Ideas.
forcolin
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-20 3:44 PM (#22699 - in reply to #22657) (#22699) Top





Posts: 172
100202020
Location: ITALY
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Tetromino/Pentomino Instructionless
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Mostly perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


rajeshk
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-20 6:31 PM (#22700 - in reply to #22657) (#22700) Top



WSPC Organizer

Posts: 542
5002020
Location: India
I liked the theme of Minesweepers and Akari where Pentominos are used :)

Edited by rajeshk 2017-03-20 6:31 PM
vopani
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-20 8:45 PM (#22701 - in reply to #22657) (#22701) Top


WSPC Organizer

Posts: 739
50010010020
Location: India
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Too many hard puzzles
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Tetromino/Pentomino Observer
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Mostly perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


Too hard for PR. Would have been a nice monthly test otherwise.
RameshLMI
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-21 6:42 AM (#22702 - in reply to #22657) (#22702) Top


SM 2020 (Converse and Odd Even) Author

Posts: 51
2020
Location: India
Puzzles were harder than previous PR round. I too felt that the answer keys for Akari and Minesweeper were lengthy. However, I enjoyed solving Minesweeper and Akari puzzles.
RameshLMI
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-21 1:38 PM (#22703 - in reply to #22657) (#22703) Top


SM 2020 (Converse and Odd Even) Author

Posts: 51
2020
Location: India
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Too many hard puzzles
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Minesweeper
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Answer keys could have been better


Joo M.Y
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-21 4:34 PM (#22704 - in reply to #22657) (#22704) Top




Posts: 72
202020
Location: South Korea
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Tetromino/Pentomino Instructionless
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Mostly perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


An LMI player
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-21 6:05 PM (#22705 - in reply to #22657) (#22705) Top


 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Too many medium difficult puzzles
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Fairly Nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Hungarian Tetromino/Pentomino
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Many puzzles were worth too much or too little
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


rakesh_rai
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-21 9:10 PM (#22706 - in reply to #22705) (#22706) Top



Mean Minis (2020) Author

Posts: 774
500100100202020
Location: India
The object placement round was hard in 2016 and it ended up on the harder side in 2017 as well. The results also look similar - The top 3 (among those who participated, from last year's list) are the same as well.

And, yes, the answer keys for akari and minesweeper do need improvement.
rakesh_rai
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-21 9:17 PM (#22707 - in reply to #22684) (#22707) Top



Mean Minis (2020) Author

Posts: 774
500100100202020
Location: India
rob - 2017-03-18 2:54 AM

...Worse, the example is uniquely solvable with the given solution with the following rules: Normal battleships. Equals sign between cells means both cells are filled or both are empty. Less than sign between cells means that if the "smaller" cell is filled, then also the "greater" cell must be filled.
That sounds more "thermo" than "inequality".

For me, the example was good enough and since all the signs were placed in the centre row/column, it was quite apparent that the inequality relation applies to the two vertical/horizontal halves.
greenhorn
Subject: Re: Object Placement & Pentomino - 17th to 20th Mar 2017 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier @ 2017-03-21 9:50 PM (#22708 - in reply to #22707) (#22708) Top


2021 World Sudoku+Puzzle Convention Organizer

Posts: 164
100202020
Location: Slovakia
rakesh_rai - 2017-03-21 9:17 PM

For me, the example was good enough and since all the signs were placed in the centre row/column, it was quite apparent that the inequality relation applies to the two vertical/horizontal halves.


Agree, the example was fine. However I get confused by the Observer instructions. I am probably to lazy to read (or understand) the rules carefully, but it took me few minutes to realize that the numbers are always excluding the cell itself. I am not sure whether it is usual or not, but most of the puzzles like Cave or Kuromasu operate with "including" rule. I can not see any reason why to change the rules from time to time.

Anyway, this test was great and even though I was disappointed by my performance, I really enjoyed solving the puzzles. Just after the test, I am quite surprised by my ranking. I would never guess, that incomplete solution may lead to 11th position. However the difficulty of tests within a series should be more balanced in the future.
42 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1 2
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version