Login Register WSPC 2017 • Schedule • Participation • Location • WSC • WPC • Contact •Search •Recent





Number and Object Placement - 21st - 26th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020
   LMI Tests -> Puzzle Ramayan36 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1 2
An LMI player
Subject: Re: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 25th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-23 9:44 PM (#27631 - in reply to #27596) (#27631) Top


 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Fairly Nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Ripple Loop
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


An LMI player
Subject: Re: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 25th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-24 3:46 AM (#27632 - in reply to #27596) (#27632) Top


 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


bob
Subject: Re: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 25th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-24 7:09 AM (#27633 - in reply to #27596) (#27633) Top




Posts: 59
2020
Location: United States
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Too many hard puzzles
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Kropkshiki
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Many puzzles were worth too much or too little
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


Fun puzzles. Just no where near enough time for me. Didn't eveln look at some of them.
An LMI player
Subject: Re: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 25th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-24 10:25 AM (#27634 - in reply to #27596) (#27634) Top


 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Too many hard puzzles
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Ripple Loop
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth too much or too little
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


Grizix
Subject: Re: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 25th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-24 8:48 PM (#27646 - in reply to #27596) (#27646) Top




Posts: 30
20
Location: France
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Fairly Nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Loaded Battleships
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Answer keys were horrible
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


I really don't like entering columns as letters for the battleships answer keys. It could be digits, it's simpler to read, and faster to type on a numpad.
Same for polyominoes, it could be the size of the colored parts, it's faster to type than letters.
rakesh_rai
Subject: Re: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 25th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-24 9:41 PM (#27647 - in reply to #27646) (#27647) Top



Mean Minis (2020) Author

Posts: 774
500100100202020
Location: India
Grizix - 2020-02-24 8:48 PM

I really don't like entering columns as letters for the battleships answer keys. It could be digits, it's simpler to read, and faster to type on a numpad.
Same for polyominoes, it could be the size of the colored parts, it's faster to type than letters.

Thanks for your viewpoint and we are concerned that you found the answer keys horrible while most other participants were ok.

For Polyominoes, your suggested answer key is an altogether different kind of answer key and does not clearly tell if the solver placed the correct polyomino. So the letters do serve a purpose here. Last year, we had asked names of the first three shapes from a direction, again letters only.

For Battleships, letters are already provided for easy reference above the grid. So it should not be that difficult. The numbers are avoided for a reason again. Numbers can possibly cause confusion with battleship outside clues which are also numbers.

Yes, we do consider things like "simpler to read" and "easier to type" but that is not the only consideration.
ABcDexter
Subject: Re: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 25th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-24 11:05 PM (#27651 - in reply to #27596) (#27651) Top


PR 2020 (MII and Regions) Author

Posts: 48
2020
Location: India
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Too many easy puzzles
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Battleships
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


Feadoor
Subject: Re: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 25th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-25 4:10 AM (#27653 - in reply to #27596) (#27653) Top




Posts: 22
20
Location: United Kingdom
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Too many medium difficult puzzles
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Ripple Loop
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Mostly perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


An LMI player
Subject: Re: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 25th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-25 7:12 AM (#27654 - in reply to #27596) (#27654) Top


 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Just right
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Fairly Nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Futoshiki
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Perfect answer keys
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


mstang
Subject: Re: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 25th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-25 10:15 AM (#27656 - in reply to #27596) (#27656) Top





Posts: 74
202020
Location: United States
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Too many hard puzzles
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Polyominoes
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


Good test, although harder than I expected! I got everything but the last two Kropkis. The quality was very high, in my view. Thanks!!

Edited by mstang 2020-02-25 10:15 AM
tamz29
Subject: Re: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 25th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-25 2:11 PM (#27657 - in reply to #27596) (#27657) Top




Posts: 225
10010020
Location: Thailand
Phew. Finished this test with a minute to spare.
I was really slow with the Latin Squares.
Thankfully, I made up for it with the Object Placement portion.

Number Placement should perhaps include other genres as well (maybe Products, Summon, heck, even Nansuke?) - 3/4 types being Latin Squares was maybe a bit... much.
I noticed a wild imbalance with points/minute solve - but this is often common with the placement genre since you could quickly intuit to a solution.
For example, I took only 90 seconds to solve 8 points worth of Akari, whereas I'd take 10 minutes+ to solve 8 points worth of Kropki.
The presentation of Weighted Battleships (I think that was the original name) could've had the digits written on the ships (which is usually made lighter grey) to make it easier to visualize.

Loved the test. You could see the intended logic path behind most of these puzzles. The 14-Battleships deserves a special mention.
Thanks!
Administrator
Subject: Re: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 26th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-25 2:31 PM (#27658 - in reply to #27657) (#27658) Top


2000100050020
Location: India

24 hours extension


The test is extended by 24 hours and will now be open till 23:59 on 26th February.

Feadoor
Subject: RE: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 26th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-25 8:36 PM (#27659 - in reply to #27596) (#27659) Top




Posts: 22
20
Location: United Kingdom
A question: if every test is going to be extended by 24 hours, why not just start each test with the extra day already included and save yourself the hassle?
rakesh_rai
Subject: RE: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 26th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-25 10:15 PM (#27660 - in reply to #27659) (#27660) Top



Mean Minis (2020) Author

Posts: 774
500100100202020
Location: India
Feadoor - 2020-02-25 8:36 PM

A question: if every test is going to be extended by 24 hours, why not just start each test with the extra day already included and save yourself the hassle?

Yes. It is a valid point and has been discussed internally too.

There is a reason we are not doing it. If we directly do it till Wednesday then people may ask for extension till Thursday and we want to avoid that.
peluri
Subject: Re: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 26th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-25 11:38 PM (#27662 - in reply to #27596) (#27662) Top




Posts: 26
20
Location: Finland
 What was your opinion of the distribution of easy/hard puzzles? Too many hard puzzles
 What did you think about the puzzle quality of the test? Very nice
 Which set of puzzles did you like the most? Futoshiki
 What was your opinion about the answer key extraction? Perfect answer keys
 Of the puzzles you solved/attempted, how well did the point values reflect the difficulty? Most puzzles were worth the right amount
 What was your opinion of the booklet formatting and printing? Just right


Administrator
Subject: Re: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 26th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-27 7:50 AM (#27665 - in reply to #27596) (#27665) Top


2000100050020
Location: India
Congratulations to Endo Ken, Kota Morinishi and Hideaki Jo for taking the top three places.

Thanks to the 270 participants from 37 countries. Among participants who scored points, Michael Ley (Germany) was the first to start the test while David Cohen (USA) was the last person to start the test. 21 participants completed the set within the allotted time, while another 20 participants completed 20+ puzzles. The median score of the test was 45.3.

Top finishers for countries with 10+ participants:

India(50): Prasanna Seshadri, Rohan Rao and Ashish Kumar
Japan(27): Ryotaro Chiba, Tomoya Kimura, Kazuya Yamamoto (ranks 4-6)
USA(22): Walker Anderson, Anderson Wang and Jeffrey Bardon
Italy(16): Giuliano Montelucci, Stefano Forcolin and Arianna Domenichelli
Germany(15): Michael Ley, Robert Vollmert and Martin Merker
France(15): Denis Auroux, Anne Limoges and Philippe Meyer
Poland(11): Tomasz Skalski, Lukasz Skrzypczynski and Mateusz Przybyla
UK(11): Jeremy Kong, Sam Cappleman-Lynes and Freddie Hand
Slovakia(10): Marek Kasar, Natalia Chanova, and Veronika Kolvekova

Thanks Harmeet Singh and Pranav Kamesh for the puzzles!

Participants may share feedback on the results page and rate the puzzles on the contest page.
Administrator
Subject: Re: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 26th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-27 7:56 AM (#27666 - in reply to #27596) (#27666) Top


2000100050020
Location: India
The Solution Booklet is now available here.
harmeet
Subject: Re: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 26th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-27 6:19 PM (#27667 - in reply to #27596) (#27667) Top


SM 2020 (Converse and Odd Even) Author

Posts: 85
20202020
Location: India
Thanks to LMI for giving an opportunity to Pranav and me to author PR2. Thanks to Rakesh for guiding, test solving and overseeing many other things in the background. Congrats to the podium finishers. There were 21 solvers (across 8 countries) who finished all puzzles in time. The test got inclined towards the hard side and general feedback reflects the same. We take constructive feedback of choosing variety in puzzle types. It is a learning curve for us and we see an opportunity in improving the balance of the test for wide spectrum of puzzle solvers. Special mention of Pranav as he came up with an amazing set of puzzles. It never looked like he was authoring for the first time.
pranavmanu
Subject: Re: Number and Object Placement - 21st - 26th Feb 2020 - Puzzle Ramayan & IPC Qualifier 2020 @ 2020-02-27 8:10 PM (#27668 - in reply to #27596) (#27668) Top




Posts: 55
2020
Location: India
Congratulations to Endo Ken, Kota Morinishi and Hideaki Jo for completing the all Japanese Podium, and congratulations to Prasanna, Rohan and Ashish for finishing in the top 3 among Indians.
It was a test on the harder side going by the feedback. The lack of puzzle type variety is a quite valid criticism, and we shall keep it in mind for future rounds.
It was a nice experience to author PR (for the first time). Thank you to Harmeet and Rakesh for helping me with puzzle ideas, test solving and their general insights!
It was fantastic to see the solve path and general smoothness of Harmeet's creations as I test solved, and its something i will try to incorporate into my creations as well!
Looking forward to the next round!
36 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1 2
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version