Comments on 2013-09-11's Tapaprasanna16391 commented at 2013-09-11 00:06:09 What a stupid error! Great thematic puzzle. rob commented at 2013-09-11 01:39:27 Well... took quite a while to realise that two neighbouring 2s aren't neighbouring 22s.swaroop2011 commented at 2013-09-11 06:11:07 Ahha, I guess because of symmetric clues arrenged symmetrically i was able to do fast as most of the places no need to think again :)swaroop2011 commented at 2013-09-11 06:11:43 But yes an awesome and beautiful puzzle to begin the bigger grids :)
kiwijam commented at 2013-09-11 16:09:06 Serrkan, I was just kidding ;)yureklis commented at 2013-09-11 16:12:43 :) I know. I made these puzzles nearly one week agodebmohanty commented at 2013-09-11 16:27:16 I will have the solution ready in a paper, and see if I can type it in '113' secondschaotic_iak commented at 2013-09-11 18:34:30 @deb: Actually it's possible; you only need to shade the black cells right. If you don't just see the paper (but also thinking for some trivial steps so no time wasted looking on the paper), 113 sounds likely. :Pfigonometry commented at 2013-09-11 23:08:00 I like the big grids, except when it takes forever to find a stupid error.
WSPC 2017 • Schedule • Participation • Location • WSC • WPC • Contact •Search •Recent
