Login Register WSPC 2017 • Schedule • Participation • Location • WSC • WPC • Contact •Search •Recent





Minesweeper
   Old Forums -> Answer Key discussion / Suggestions3 posts • Page 1 of 1 • 1
Administrator
Subject: Minesweeper @ 2011-07-03 2:44 PM (#4998) (#4998) Top


20001000500202020
Location: India		Method 1 : Enter the number of mines in each row. (321334)
(Bit error prone)

Method 2 : (In Tapa Style) - Enter the number of consecutive mines in the marked rows / columns. (For R5 key is 111, for C1 key is 13)

Method 3 : Describe marked rows or columns, using 1 for mine and 0 for no mine (for R5 key is 100101, for C1 key is 010111)


vopani
Subject: Re: Minesweeper @ 2011-07-05 6:46 PM (#5029 - in reply to #4998) (#5029) Top


WSPC Organizer

Posts: 739
50010010020
Location: India		In Method 2, there are likely chances that the grid need not be solved completely. Suppose in row 3, you know there is 1 mine, but you dont know which one, either R3C5 or R3C6, you need not find the mine to enter the answer key. This is just an example. The actual puzzle may not have it like this I'm sure, but one needs to be really careful in choosing the row/column.

I would go for Method 3.
debmohanty
Subject: RE: Minesweeper @ 2011-07-05 8:06 PM (#5036 - in reply to #4998) (#5036) Top



1000500100100100202020
Location: India		I like Method2 because it is less typing. Obviously, depends upon specific puzzle.
Method3 is also okay.

Method1 is definitely discouraged.
3 posts • Page 1 of 1 • 1
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version